# The Mazda/Father Dossier — Start Here

> This is the canonical public entry point to the eFireTemple Mazda/Father dossier. The numbered runs are the research skeleton and provenance layer; this page states the current public case and points to the strongest exhibits.

## The thesis

The dossier argues three linked propositions:

1. **Ahura Mazda is the Father identified by Jesus.** The affirmative case is built from the older Iranian Father-of-Aša / Truth architecture, Aša versus Druj, nondeception, beneficent divine agency, historical contact, the Magi, later Jewish development, the Johannine Father-profile, candidate comparison, and the Role–Source argument.
2. **The full composite Yahweh profile is incompatible with Jesus' Father-profile.** The dossier's negative case focuses on deception and lying-spirit agency, hardening, incitement, destructive sovereignty, killing, violence, and the conflict those features create with the sealed Father-profile.
3. **Daniel is a late Maccabean pseudepigraphic witness whose prophetic framing is treated by this dossier as intentional deceptive authentication.** Daniel is therefore a late developmental receipt, not the original source of the Iranian case.

## Read it three ways

- **New reader:** read the four showcase tracks on the homepage.
- **Critic:** open the claim ledger, objections, controls, and reversal rules.
- **Scholar:** follow the proof links into the 001–079 run archive, branches, source logs, and preserved source ZIPs.

## Canonical files

- [Current verdict](../current-verdict.md)
- [Mazda the Father](mazda-the-father.md)
- [Yahweh dossier](yahweh-dossier.md)
- [Daniel dossier](daniel-dossier.md)
- [Challenge and audit](challenge-and-audit.md)
- [Claim ledger](../claims.md)
- [Machine-readable claims](../claims.json)
- [Corrections and supersessions](../corrections.md)
- [AI navigation](../llms.txt)

## Provenance rule

If a summary conflicts with the current verdict, use the later non-superseded current-verdict and claim-ledger files. Historical runs document how the case developed; they are not all equally current.